Industrialization Theory
Efficient Ponzi Production — Full Chain Optimization from Trust Cost to Exit Cost
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| INDUSTRIALIZATION |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| "One hit wonder" is gambler's fallacy |
| |
| To profit: launch continuously, at low cost |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+1/ Understanding Schemes Industrially
To industrially produce schemes, you must first understand them industrially.
The Three-Scheme Theory is essentially a high-level abstraction of Ponzi forms, transcending bull/bear markets, cycles, and specific models. This helps you understand, conceptualize, and design schemes.
Like wafers need design but also manufacturing process, scheme production execution is even more important
2/ Scheme Lifecycle Costs
Five major costs in scheme lifecycle:
| # | Cost | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trust Cost | Costs paid to hook the audience |
| 2 | Development Cost | Production, iteration, and security costs |
| 3 | Acquisition Cost | Traffic costs per unit of capital inflow |
| 4 | Market Making Cost | Costs from pumping to dump |
| 5 | Exit Cost | Costs to maximize market cap exit profits |
3/ Trust Cost
Costs paid to gain sufficient audience trust and hook them:
| Type | Description | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Credit Backing | VC investment, ecosystem awards, licenses, celebrity endorsements | High |
| Interpersonal Credit Backing | Office visits, hospitality trips, relationship building | Medium |
| Contract Restrictions | Open-source smart contracts making users believe project can't rug | Low |
Most people trust authority and are lazy thinkers
By scheme type, trust cost from high to low:
Dividend Ponzi > Split Ponzi > Mutual-Aid PonziThis is mainly determined by user sunk costs—higher sunk costs require higher credit costs.
4/ Trust Cost Cases
- Mining coins: Often have major backing, top North American institutions lined up (see KAS, HNT, SMH). Root cause: mining rigs are irreversible one-time investments requiring payback period calculations, high trust cost
- L1 ecosystem coins: Need to see who invested in the chain, whether it has funding, or a good community
- DeFi LP/Memecoins: Can skip backing, just check contracts and ape in
5/ Development Cost
Comprehensive production, iteration, and security costs for creating a scheme.
Principle:
- More complex and non-standard products = higher costs
- Must raise funds or partner with ecosystems
- Minimize product complexity to minimize costs
Opportunity Cost:
- Market changes rapidly
- What was hot last month or even last week is forgotten next month
- Development cycle must be as short as possible
6/ How to Streamline Products?
Follow the "Closest to Money" Principle:
Directly related to user deposits/withdrawals = Essential
Everything else = Unnecessary complexity
Borrow external tools when possible, don't build unless absolutely necessaryCase: Pandora and 404
Previous cycle DeFi approach: Build entire NFT fractionalization protocol DAPP, even make your own DEX
Users don't care about fractionalization quality—they care about liquidity. Nothing has more liquidity than Uni.
Solution: Remove the DAPP, use Uniswap, build functionality into the token
Token standards have much higher reusability than entire applications, with lower amortized costs
7/ Functionality in Tokens
Following "functionality in tokens" logic, many DeFi edge protocols—especially liquidity protocols—have no reason to exist.
Cases:
- WHO_ERC404: Sold bonds via NFT at launch, injecting liquidity into Uniswap through taxation for cold start
- YESMONEY420: Built "treasury" and "protocol-owned liquidity" logic into a token
Saved an entire frontend. Most engineering is in frontend; contracts are relatively easy. Less is more, less is secure
Trend: From FT to inscriptions to 404, low-liquidity asset schemes trend toward minimal functionality and security pressure
8/ Acquisition Cost
Scheme's traffic cost per unit of capital inflow. Essentially an audience theory problem.
Traditional ground-pushed schemes: Operations centers + hospitality costs amortized per depositing user
Online push cost structure:
| Cost | Description |
|---|---|
| Channel Cost | KOL fees, team leader extra allocations, ad placement |
| Activation Cost | Costs to activate and maintain audience, like airdrops, whitelists |
| Operations Cost | Internal team labor and time opportunity costs |
Unlike sales-heavy ground pushing, online pushing is event marketing. When is traffic highest? During launches and events
9/ Memecoin Industrialization
Memecoins essentially are event marketing around launches or early market cap, focused on 2-3 day timeframes.
Memecoin Industrialization = Channel cost amortization
+ Binding to influential distribution paths
+ Repeated launches lowering communication trust costsFor ETH memecoins: Deploy token, create pool, start Twitter, build TG, post to alpha groups and KOLs
Mature teams need just 10 minutes. When Elon tweets, Twitter bots monitor keywords and instantly deploy contracts.
10/ L1 Scheme Industrialization
L1s (usually dividend + split) have long cycles, from fundraising to listing might take half a year to a year.
Early audience is VCs, later stage is exchange listings to profit from secondary.
Promotion costs become: Costs of creating data to convince single VC/listing (TVL, address count, weekly active)
Activation cost is largest scale cost:
- Project goal: Spend minimum money triggering longest duration activity
- Points systems are inevitable choice: No commitments and manipulable, fully leveraging expectations
11/ L1 Industrialization Methods
-
Make user triggering continuous, not event-based one-reward-per-event (points only affect reward pool distribution)
-
Use same traffic system to rapidly cold-start split sub-schemes. Like Odyssey or Linea's points system:
- No matter the project, use same activity system
- No need for separate planning or channels
- Greatly reduces promotion operations and channel costs
Schemes need control (no rugs). Infrastructure must be transparent and permissionless for schemes to use (fear of being rugged)
12/ Market Making Cost
Operator costs from pumping to dump:
| Cost | Description |
|---|---|
| Chip Acquisition Cost | Costs to acquire enough chips to control the market |
| Transaction Cost | Gas fees or trading fees |
| Manipulation Cost | Costs to create market data inducing users to trade in certain directions |
13/ Chip Acquisition Cost
Except for rare purely community-driven projects, most projects need market control, and control requires 90%+ chips.
Community launch projects:
- Need to address trust cost issues
- Must be 100% pool or airdrop
Exchange listing projects:
- Can't raise funds without data, no data without airdrops
- Major exchange chip management is strict, but insider allocations and rat warehouses must be provided
Specific costs:
| Type | Cost Items |
|---|---|
| Inscriptions | Mint miner fees, separate wallet chip-hiding miner fees |
| Memecoins/404 | Separate wallet gas, frontrun/MEV costs, airdrop gas or dev costs |
| Listing projects | Separate wallet gas, task capital costs, source wallet creation costs |
Without rat warehouses, market cap can only rely on market turnover, operators can't guide secondary. This is necessary cost
14/ Manipulation Cost
Costs to create market data inducing users to trade in certain directions:
- KOL/media manipulation costs
- Critical level floor-sweeping/chart-painting costs
- Volume wash trading gas costs
15/ Free Mint Case
Free mint has same effect as airdrops, essentially low-cost acquisition creating maximum hype. Enough hype = sufficient buy-side in initial stage.
Problem: Pure on-chain mint is bot warfare
Solution: Centralized mint eligibility control is one of the best low-liquidity asset market-making methods
Better than paid sales (community fears rug)
But pure fair launches with no rat warehouses lead to inability to control market, early stage can only rely on market turnover game, actually exhausting secondary price expectations.
16/ Anti-Sybil Essence
High-fundraising projects complete data and rat warehouse injection through tasks or Points.
Rat warehouses include:
- Stakeholders
- Distribution channels
- Project team itself
Anti-Sybil = Optimizing chip structure method
Because airdrops distribute proportionally, this is a variant way to reduce chip acquisition and manipulation costs.
Fish in troubled waters
17/ Exit Cost
Costs paid to maximize market cap exit profits:
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Violent Exit | Presale rug, pool closure (excluding Uni pool removal) |
| On-chain Exit | Covering operator's intent to dump during operation |
| Off-chain Exit | Avoiding monitoring or risk controls when dumping via exchanges |
Violent exit costs:
- On-chain anti-tracking costs (mixers or black market)
- Exchange or path freezing risks
Boil the frog slowly better than hitting the wall. Should avoid single exit targets being too large
18/ Industrialization Summary
Five elements of industrialization:
| Dimension | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Technology | Reuse mature tech + micro-innovation + composability |
| Trust | Assess credit needs by audience, minimize costs |
| Acquisition | Go where traffic is high (or predict) |
| Market Cap | Low-cost chip control, improve market manipulation cost-efficiency |
| Exit | Execute early, prepare long-term |
Industrialization tests technical proficiency, team coordination, resource integration, execution planning—requires repeated launches to refine.
Essence of Elitism
Industry elitism doesn't mean participants have higher credentials and better resumes—they're just the facade.
Real backbone:
- Teams professionalized and industrialized in all scheme areas
- Fast delivery, fast launches, fast penetration
- All major ETH memecoins backed by only ~10 teams
- All major viral schemes across chains, except rare US individual degen devs, are basically from Shenzhen, Ho Chi Minh, Kuala Lumpur
Your copycat today, your rat warehouse, your marketing model—one day global retail will realize without you market-making it can't even function
Next: Composability Explained