Deterministic Positives & Buyback
The Merits of Bad Money — Turkish Lira, Crypto Shorting, and Buyback Narratives
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| CARRY TRADE & BUYBACK |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| "Bad money" has its merits |
| |
| Protect LIQUIDITY, not price |
| Manage VOLATILITY structure, not trend |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+1/ Truth of Bad Money Drives Out Good
Gresham's Law says: Bad money will drive good money out of circulation.
But think from different angle:
Since free market emphasizes supply and demand, if bad money can drive out good money, isn't bad money more powerful?
This is essentially determined by stance + microstructure:
| Scenario | Bad Money Advantage |
|---|---|
| Workplace | Flatterers drive out doers, management cost lowest |
| DEX | Speculative new coins eliminate long-cycle projects, trading fee income highest |
| Currency | Bad money cost and circulation efficiency optimal |
In goal-oriented microstructures, "bad money" has advantages "good money" can't match
2/ Where Did Good Money Go?
Good money isn't eliminated, but collected, exits circulation, becomes store of value.
Problem never about quality, but:
| Type | Representative | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Store of Value Currency | Gold, BTC | Consensus, religion |
| Transactional Currency | Fiat, altcoins | Circulation priority |
By logic "altcoin value is zero", 190+ global fiat currencies also don't need to exist
3/ Turkish Lira: Magical Fiat Currency
Lira 2025 data:
- Deposit annual yield about 56.7%
- Inflation about 31-34%
- Annual depreciation vs USD about 21%
- Implied volatility 26%
Lira is globally highest yield carry trade instrument
Carry Trade Playbook:
Borrow: Borrow low-interest safe haven currencies (Yen, Swiss Franc)
|
v
Buy: Exchange for Lira, capture 50%+ interest differential
|
v
Hedge: Hedge exchange rate risk through swaps4/ Erdogan's Monetary Policy
Why such monetary policy?
| Stage | Strategy | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2018-22 | Insist on low rates under high CPI high inflation | Sacrifice exchange rate for autonomy |
| 2022-23 | Want both low exchange rate and social stability | Got slapped, inflation out of control |
| 2023-25 | Excessive rate hikes 50%+ | Abandon monetary policy autonomy |
How Does Turkey Sustain?
High rates indeed push up inflation
BUT
Continuous depreciation strengthens export competitiveness
+
Mandatory export settlement
+
Taxes, materials, labor settlement form Lira buy pressure flywheel
+
KKM and other FX protection tools lock exchange demandA "high trading volume but depreciating" currency far better than "no one dares touch, completely dysfunctional" currency
5/ Lira & Crypto Similarities
| Similarity | Lira | Crypto |
|---|---|---|
| Inevitable inflation | Monetary policy driven | Token structure driven |
| Natural price downward pressure | Inflation brings | Unlock brings |
Core Insight:
Any crypto project without full circulation cannot maintain price long-term
Any long-term unidirectional, fixed-ratio, front-runnable buyback cannot succeed
6/ Income Buyback Narrative Illusion
Hype, Pump etc. 100% income buyback story sounds beautiful, makes holders have "price has real income support" illusion.
Reality is:
Arbitrage capital can hedge in advance
|
v
Buyback instead consumes capital
|
v
Offsets price impact
Like if Turkish central bank publicly commits to stabilize exchange rate
|
v
Global arbitrage capital will swarm
|
v
Replay 97 Asian financial crisis7/ Design Token Economics Like Erdogan
Core only two points:
| Principle | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Protect liquidity, not price | Make asset always "needed" |
| Manage volatility structure, not trend | Give capital deterministic alpha |
Token System Design:
1. Must have continuous revenue (financial protocols/top L1s)
2. Token has unavoidable "tax" function (Gas, fees)
3. Provide token-denominated interest rate differential above opportunity cost + lock conditions
4. Protocol revenue forms "central bank style treasury"
└── Promise only used to intervene price
└── But non-mechanical, predictable unidirectional buyback
5. Manage volatility structure based on IV/RV/depth/funding rates8/ Dividend Mutual-Aid Model Flywheel
Dividend APY + Lock-up
|
v
Increase sunk cost
|
v
Interest rate differential + Predictable volatility
|
v
Trigger arbitrage behavior
|
v
Increase liquidatable assets and fee extraction
|
v
Feed treasury increase APY
|
v
(Loop)Achilles Heel:
- Whether system continues
- Whether project continuously obtains revenue
- Whether lending rates controllable
9/ Can Profit Shorting in Crypto
US stocks shorting hard because:
- Mathematically returns capped
- Long-term structural bull market
But crypto isn't:
Most projects can't reverse trend, no "macro-level reflexivity tools"
Dumping doesn't cost money, pumping does
Real Risk of Shorting:
Doesn't come from project itself, but counterparties
- Exchange suddenly changes rules
- Funding rate extreme changes
- Long liquidity suddenly withdraws
XPL and MMT are very good examples
Core Formula
Token Design Principles:
├── Protect liquidity, not price
├── Manage volatility, not trend
└── Give capital deterministic alpha
Lira Survival Reasons:
├── High rates attract Carry Trade
├── Central bank manages volatility
└── Exchange rate characteristics bring real demand
Buyback Narrative Trap:
├── Unidirectional predictable buyback = Arbitrage opportunity
├── Buyback consumes capital but can't support price
└── Should use for volatility management not trendExchanges like you, liquid funds like you. Holders don't like you, but this is crypto market
I'm just not that orthodox good