Application Framework
Case Analysis Template
Standardized Analysis Framework for Dissecting Any Project with Three Ponzi Theory
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ANALYSIS TEMPLATE |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| "Everything is a ponzi" |
| Good crypto project = Good ponzi first |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+Analysis Framework
Use the following framework to analyze any crypto project:
Step 1: Scheme Type Identification
Checklist:
| Question | Dividend Ponzi | Mutual-Aid Ponzi | Split Ponzi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forms a capital pool? | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Allows free entry/exit? | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Promises fixed returns? | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
Judgment Logic:
Locked deposits + linear dividends → Dividend Ponzi elements
Capital lending + maturity mismatch → Mutual-Aid Ponzi elements
Asset multiplication + attracting inflows → Split Ponzi elementsStep 2: Three-Scheme Combination Analysis
Most projects are three-scheme combinations, need to identify each layer:
Combination Structure Template:
| Project | Elements |
|---|---|
| Project Name | _________________ |
| Dividend Ponzi Elements | _________________ |
| Mutual-Aid Ponzi Elements | _________________ |
| Split Ponzi Elements | _________________ |
Step 3: Collapse Condition Analysis
Determine collapse conditions based on scheme type:
| Scheme Type | Collapse Condition |
|---|---|
| Dividend Ponzi | New deposits < Fixed return interest |
| Mutual-Aid Ponzi | Global debt > Liquidatable assets + External liquidity |
| Split Ponzi | New buy-side < Split demand OR Existing holders dump massively |
Step 4: Operator Profit Analysis
profit(Dividend Ponzi) = Total deposits - Total fixed dividends
profit(Mutual-Aid Ponzi) = Total mutual-aid state capital × % rat warehouse accounts
profit(Split Ponzi) = Project team dump total profitsKey Questions:
- How does the operator extract?
- Where are the rat warehouses?
- What's the exit path?
Step 5: Liquidity Analysis
| Dimension | Analysis Content |
|---|---|
| Liquidity Source | LP/Bots/Market Makers/Retail |
| Trading Mechanism | Order Matching/AMM/Order Book |
| Exit Path | On-chain DEX/CEX/OTC |
Step 6: Timing Analysis
Compare against current market:
Project liquidity requirement vs Current market liquidity
Project nominal return vs Current market Beta
Suitable: Project requirement ≤ Market supply
Not Suitable: Project requirement > Market supplyCase Template
Project: [Name]
1. Scheme Type Identification
- Primary Type:
- Combination Elements:
2. Operating Mechanism
- Deposit Method:
- Return Source:
- Exit Mechanism:
3. Collapse Analysis
- Collapse Condition:
- Current Status:
- Risk Level:
4. Operator Analysis
- Extraction Method:
- Rat Warehouse Location:
- Estimated Profit:
5. Timing Judgment
- Liquidity Match:
- Beta Match:
- Recommendation:
Quick Judgment Checklist
Judge a project in 5 minutes:
□ Lockup/staking mechanism? (Dividend Ponzi signal)
□ Lending/mutual-aid flow? (Mutual-Aid Ponzi signal)
□ Continuously launching new assets? (Split Ponzi signal)
□ Where's the capital pool? (Centralized/Decentralized)
□ Who's the operator? (Project team/Ecosystem/Market maker)
□ Where's exit liquidity? (DEX/CEX/None)Next: Glossary