Case Studies

ETH's Downfall

Three-Ponzi Theory analysis of Ethereum's structural supply-demand problems

+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|                    ETH DOWNFALL                            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                           |
|   Supply-side: POS removed floor price mechanism          |
|   Demand-side: No new assets priced in ETH                |
|                                                           |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+

Demand-Side Analysis

Native Factors

This cycle's problems:

Main narrative should be L2 and Restaking

But:
├── L2 ecosystem projects highly overlap with mainnet
├── Can't trigger explosive trading activity
├── PointFi and Restaking lock ETH reducing liquidity
└── Major restaking pricing power at exchanges (USDT denominated)

Compare to last cycle:

  • YFI, CRV, COMP on-chain (ETH denominated)

Without lots of new assets ETH-denominated, users have no reason to hold ETH

EIP1559 Burn Mechanism Weakened

ETH's main function: Settlement layer

Major DeFi settlement happens on mainnet

L2 functions highly overlap with mainnet

Lots of demand diverted to L2

Burns are a fraction of before

External Factors

CycleMacroExternal Demand
Last cycleEasing cycleGrayscale Trust (one-way, only buys)
This cycleTightening cycleETF (two-way, can buy and sell)

ETF Data:

  • One month since launch, total net outflow -140.83K
  • Mostly through Grayscale
  • Old and new whales both cashing out

Supply-Side Analysis

POW Era Cost Structure

Miner ETH acquisition cost:

Fixed cost (one-time, non-refundable):
└── ETH mining machine cost

Variable cost (grows over time):
├── Electricity cost
├── Hosting cost (facility, staff, maintenance)
└── Accident cost (penalties, disasters)

Key: Fiat-denominated cost, non-refundable sunk cost

Game theory relationship:

Market price < Acquisition cost (shutdown price)

Miners won't sell

Forms price floor

Mining machine iteration effect:

  • Each generation more expensive
  • Difficulty increases, output decreases
  • Electricity and hosting rise with the tide
  • Total variable cost increases → Raises ETH floor price

POS Era Cost Structure

Validator cost:
└── Infrastructure (staff, servers)

Staker cost:
├── Staked ETH opportunity cost
└── Validator fees

Key Differences:

DimensionPOWPOS
Unit acquisition costFiat-denominated, highNear zero
Machine obsolescenceHas lifespanInfinite capacity
Shutdown priceExists, supports floorDoesn't exist
Selling pressureCost constrainedCan dump infinitely

Today's Bomb Was Planted in 2018

ICO Era Lessons

End of 2018 ICO era:
├── Massive ETH-denominated ICO projects dumped chaotically
├── Crashed to below $100
├── No DEX for ETH-denominated exit
├── Projects could only dump for USDT
└── ICO Beta returns plummeted → Davis Double Kill

Formation of Institutional Rigidity

2018 lessons too painful

Vitalik and Foundation constantly emphasized:
├── Roadmap
├── Main narrative
└── Legitimacy

Formed "core circle" of developers, VCs

DeFi Summer success reinforced institutional rigidity

Chips concentrated in Eth Aligned coordinated actors

Resulting Problems

"Build for V"
"Orthodox = High valuation"

Split rate too low: Devs and schemes that can capture liquidity plummeted

Market Beta can't beat competitors: High valuations make Beta returns weaker than other chains

Core Formulas

ETH problem = Demand-side shrinkage + Supply-side costless selling pressure

Demand-side:
├── No new assets ETH-denominated
├── L2 diverts burn demand
└── ETF allows selling

Supply-side:
├── POS eliminated shutdown price
├── Acquisition cost near zero
└── Infinite mine and dump

Historical lessons:
├── Dividend schemes need fiat-denominated costs
├── Need to continuously raise cost floor
└── If you don't know how, study BTC cost model

Lessons Summary

  1. Dividend scheme longevity: Form fiat-denominated fixed and variable costs, continuously raise cost floor as liquidity increases

  2. Split scheme reducing selling pressure is only temporary: Real goal is making your mother coin the pricing asset, so holding doesn't depend on mother coin appreciation


Today's bomb was planted in 2018